E' possibile attraversare le Fasce di Van Allen?

« Older   Newer »
  Share  
Aribandus
icon9  view post Posted on 25/3/2008, 22:52




CITAZIONE
"Sarebbe infatti impossibile, a detta di ogni scienziato che si rispetti, che un qualunque essere vivente attraversi addirittura le Fasce di Van Allen, altrochè arrivare sulla Luna. (Le F. sono una stretta e poderosa cintura di radiazioni, che va da un polo all'altro della Terra, e che a sua volta protegge la Terra dalle radiazioni cosmiche, ma alla quale è impensabile per noi anche solo avvicinarsi. Ci hanno provato, negli ultimi anni, gli astronauti dello Shuttle, con risultati ben poco confortanti)".

Complottista Massimo Mazzucco, Luogocomune

Come abbiamo appena letto, con mille stratagemmi, anche offendendo gli scienziati, i cospirazionisti vogliono far credere che non sia possibile, ma in realtà sì. Assolutamente sì.
E lo sapeva pure chi, quelle Fasce, le aveva scoperte, Van Allen.
James Van Allen, colui che nel 1958 scoprì la presenza di queste fasce radioattive che avvolgono la Terra a grande altezza - ben 21 anni prima dell'Apollo 11, e quindi c'era tutto il tempo per risolvere il problema - durante le missioni Apollo era ancora vivo, ma non solo, è morto solo ad agosto 2006 (meno di due anni fa).
Davvero colui che le ha scoperte mettendo in guardia tutti... sarebbe stato zitto, fino ad oggi, per 58 anni, se non fosse stato possibile superarle? Siamo seri.

image
NASA: Pioneering Astrophysicist James Van Allen (al centro) Dies

Difatti le fasce si possono superare, come mi spiegò un conosciuto astrofisico.

CITAZIONE
E' possibile attraversare le fasce di radiazione cosi' come e' possibile rimanere sulla luna per un certo periodo di tempo senza schermaggio.
In orbita bassa (sotto le fasce di van allen, dove si trova la ISS), la dose che viene accumulata da un astronauta che stesse 1 anno in orbita e' di circa 30 rem (nel seguito assumo 1 rem = 1 rad, che e' abbastanza ragionevole per il reagionamento che segue). Per confronto la dose assorbita da ogni uomo sulla terra a causa di effetti naturali e' di circa 300 mrem (millirem)/anno, corrispondenti a 25 rem in 80 anni. Quindi un anno in orbita bassa, all'interno della ISS corrisponde piu' o meno alla dose che tutti gli uomini ricevono sulla terra nella loro vita. Questo e' uno dei motivi per cui le permanenze nello spazio sono limitate a 6 mesi, perche' in questo modo si ottengono esposizioni (addizionali) di circa 15 rem che sono molto minori delle esposizioni professionali nella carriera di persone che svolgono attivita' nel settore spaziale o nucleare (tra 100 e 400 rem nella vita). Non c'e' alcuna evidenza che dosi del genere possano essere dannose per l'uomo (insorgenza di tumori).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
da http://www.health-physics.com/pt/re/health...y256UJO!250

The career limits range from 1.0 Sv (100 rem) for a 24-y-old female up to 4.0 Sv (400 rem) for a 55-y-old male, compared with the previous single limit of 4.0 Sv (400 rem).
-----------------

da http://hps.org/documents/radiationrisk.pdf

In accordance with current knowledge of radiation health risks, the Health Physics Society recommends against quantitative estimation of health risks below an individual dose of 5 rem in one year or a lifetime dose of 10 rem above that received from natural sources. Doses from natural background radiation in the United States average about 0.3 rem per year. A dose of 5 rem will be accumulated in the first 17 years of life and about 25 rem in a lifetime of 80 years. Estimation of health risk associated with radiation doses that are of similar magnitude as those received from natural sources should be strictly qualitative and encompass a range of hypothetical health outcomes, including the possibility of no adverse health effects at such low levels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nello spazio interplanetario (e quindi sulla luna) la dose sale a circa 90 rem/anno (trascuro le tempeste solari). Ma le missioni sulla luna sono durate in tutto 7-10 giorni ciascuna, per cui la dose che si accumulava in questo periodo era di circa 0.3 rem o la dose che si prende in un anno sulla terra.
Per quanto riguarda le fasce di Van Allen, e' vero che l' intensita' e quindi il flusso cresce in certe zone fino ad un fattore 10000, ma il tempo trascorso dagli astronauti in queste fasce e' breve ( le fasce si estendono fino a circa 10000 km dalla superfice terrestre), per cui la dose accumulata nel caso piu' pessimistico e' non puo' superare : 30 rem/anno * 10.000 (intensita' delle fasce) * 0.1 giorni (durata del passaggio nella zona intensa delle fasce) = 90 rem, o circa 3 volte la dose raccolta sulla terra nella vita.
In realta' il calcolo mostra che date le orbite prescelte, lo schermaggio della capsula etc, la dose assorbita e' molto minore, e diventa compatibile con quella accumulata sulla terra nel corso di una vita normale, fermo restando che nessuna evidenza sperimentale porta a ritenere che 90 rem sono pericolosi per la salute.
Per cui la risposta e' che le fasce si attraversano facilmente e sulla luna la radiazione non impedisce dei soggiorni di qualche settimana, senza particolari schermaggi.



Edited by Aribandus - 27/3/2008, 01:57
 
Top
Aribandus
view post Posted on 27/3/2008, 00:36




(nella parte iniziale, il post precedente è stato aggiornato)

CITAZIONE
BIOMEDICAL RESULTS OF APOLLO
SECTION II CHAPTER 3
RADIATION PROTECTION AND INSTRUMENTATION

by J. Vernon Bailey - Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center
http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/books/apollo/S2ch3.htm

Introduction
The solar and cosmic radiation found in space has long been recognized as a possible danger in space travel. Exposure to such radiation has the potential of causing serious medical problems. For example, radiation exposure can produce a number of significant changes in various elements of the blood, making an individual more susceptible to disease; also, ionizing radiations of the type found in space can produce significant damage to the lens of the eye. Radiation exposure can also cause temporary or lasting damage to the reproductive system ranging from reduced fertility to permanent sterility. The extent of damage depends upon the tissue involved, the duration of exposure, the dose received, and other factors.

Apollo missions placed men for the first time outside the Earth’s geomagnetic shield, subjecting them to potentially hazardous particulate radiation of an intensity and frequency not encountered in the Earth’s environment. In addition, various aspects of ground-based operations in support of Apollo missions involved some exposure to radioactive materials, for example during manufacture, testing, and installation of radioluminescent panels in the spacecraft. In flight, astronauts were exposed to both manmade radiations and those occurring naturally in space. Of the two, space radiations posed the larger hazard and were largely uncontrollable. Manmade radiation sources, while of appreciable strength, could be controlled.

The Apollo radiation protection program focused on both the natural radiations encountered in space and manmade radiations encountered on the ground and in the space environment. In both areas, the basic philosophy remained the same: to avoid harmful radiation effects by limiting the radiation dose to the lowest level judged consistent with the achievement of beneficial goals.


Radiation from Space
During a complete Apollo mission, astronauts were exposed to widely varying radiation sources. These included the Van Allen belts, cosmic rays, neutrons, and other subatomic particles created in high-energy collisions of primary particles with spacecraft materials. Spacecraft transfer from low Earth orbit to translunar coast necessitated traverse of the regions of geomagnetically trapped electrons and protons known as the Van Allen belts. When beyond these belts, the spacecraft and crewmen were continuously subjected to high-energy cosmic rays and to varying probabilities of particle bursts from the sun. In addition, the individual responsibilities of the crewmen differed, and with these, their radiation exposure. Free-space extravehicular activity, lunar surface activity and intravehicular Command and Lunar Module activity imposed varying radiation doses.


Van Allen Belts
The problem of protecting astronauts against the radiation found within the Van Allen belts was recognized before the advent of manned space flight. These two bands of trapped radiation, discovered during the Explorer I flight in 1958, consist principally of protons and high-energy electrons, a significant part of which were, at that time, debris from high-altitude tests of nuclear weapons. The simple solution to protection is to remain under the belts [below an altitude of approximately 556 km (? 300 nautical miles)] when in Earth orbit, and to traverse the belts rapidly on the way to outer space. In reality, the problem is somewhat more complex. The radiation belts vary in altitude over various parts of the Earth and are absent over the north and south magnetic poles. A particularly significant portion of the Van Allen belts is a region known as the South Atlantic anomaly.
image

Over the South Atlantic region, the geomagnetic field draws particles closer to the Earth than in other regions of the globe. The orbit inclination of a spacecraft determines the number of passes made per day through this region and, thus, the radiation dose.

Particles within the Van Allen belts, in spiraling around the Earth’s magnetic lines of force, display directionality. This directionality varies continuously in angular relationship to the trajectory of the spacecraft. Therefore, dosimetry instrumentation for use in the Van Allen belts had relatively omnidirectional radiation sensors so that the radiation flux would be measured accurately. The Van Allen belt dosimeter
image
was designed specifically for Apollo dosimetry within these radiation belts.


Solar-Particle Radiation
No major solar-particle events occurred during an Apollo mission. Although much effort has been expended in the field of solar-event forecasting, individual eruptions from the solar surface have proved impossible to forecast. The best that can be provided is an estimate of particle dose, given visual or radio-frequency (RF) confirmation that an eruption has occurred. A system of solar-monitoring stations, the Solar Particle Alert Network (SPAN), provides a NASA-sponsored network of continuous data on solar-flare activity. SPAN consists of three multiple-frequency radio telescopes and seven optical telescopes. The network gives data for determining the severity of solar-particle events and the resultant possible radiation hazards to crewmen. After the appearance of particles is confirmed onboard a spacecraft, protective action can be taken.

In terms of hazard to crewmen in the heavy, well shielded Command Module, even one of the largest solar-particle event series on record (August 4-9, 1972) would not have caused any impairment of crewmember functions or ability of the crewmen to complete their mission safely. It is estimated that within the Command Module during this event the crewmen would have received a dose of 360 rads[*] to their skin and 35 rads to their blood-forming organs (bone and spleen). Radiation doses to crewmen while inside the thinly shielded Lunar Module or during an extravehicular activity (EVA) would be extremely serious for such a particle event. To monitor particle activity, a nuclear-particle-detection system
image
was designed to have a relatively narrow acceptance angle. It measured the isotropic proton and alpha particles derived from solar-particle events.

__________

[*]Radiation absorbed dose. Corresponds to absorption of watts (100 ergs) per gram of any medicine.


Cosmic Rays
Cosmic ray fluxes, consisting of completely ionized atomic nuclei originating outside the solar system and accelerated to very high energies, provided average dose rates of 1.0 millirads per hour in cislunar space[**] and 0.6 millirads per hour on the lunar surface. These values are expected to double at the low point in the 11-year cycle of solar-flare activity (solar minimum) because of decreased solar magnetic shielding of the central planets. The effect of high-energy cosmic rays on humans is unknown but is considered by most authorities not to be of serious concern for exposures of less than a few years. Experimental evidence of the effects of these radiations is dependent on the development of highly advanced particle accelerators or the advent of long-term manned missions outside the Earth’s geomagnetic influence.

__________

[**]That region of space between the Earth and the moon or the moon’s orbit.


Neutrons
Neutrons created by cosmic rays in collision with lunar materials were postulated to be a potential hazard to Apollo crewmen (Kastner et al., 1969). Two methods for neutron-dose assessment were used. These techniques of whole-body counting and neutron-resonant foil were initiated on the Apollo 11 mission. Later analyses indicated that neutron doses were significantly lower than had been anticipated. Both methods were retained because of the remaining potential for neutron production by solar-event particles and because of possible crewman exposure to neutrons from the SNAP-27 radioisotope thermal generator used to power the Apollo lunar surface experiments packages.


Detection Devices
To allow accurate determination of overall radiation exposure of the crewmen, each carried a personal radiation dosimeter (PRD)
image
and three passive dosimeters.
image
The PRD provided visual readout of accumulated radiation dose to each crewman as the mission progressed. It is approximately the size of a cigarette pack, and pockets were provided in the flight coveralls as well as in the space suit for storage. The passive dosimeters were placed in the garments worn throughout the mission. By placing these detectors at various locations (ankle, thigh, and chest) within the garments, accurate radiation doses for body portions were determined.

A radiation-survey meter (RSM)
image
allowed crewmen to determine radiation levels in any desired location in their compartment. Crewmen could use the RSM, a direct-reading dose-rate instrument, to find a habitable low-dose region within the spacecraft in the event of a radiation emergency.


Problems Involving Radiations of Manmade Origin
Protection against manmade sources of radiation is a ground support function concerned mainly with the protection of the ground personnel, the general public, and the environment against detrimental effects of radiation. Much of this effort involved routine health-physics procedures governed by U.S. Atomic Energy Commission regulations (Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, 1971) and U.S. Department of Labor Standards (Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, 1971). However, certain problems concerning spacecraft radioluminescent sources were peculiar to the Apollo Program. The chief problems were leakage of radioactive material from radioluminescent switch tips, and emission of excess soft X-ray radiation from radioluminescent panels. Both of these problems were solved.

A summary of all of the onboard instrumentation used during Apollo missions to assess radiation exposure is presented in Table 1.
image

Results and Discussion
Average radiation doses were computed for each mission (table 2).
image
Individual readings varied approximately 20 percent from the average because of differences in the shielding effectiveness of various parts of the Apollo spacecraft as well as differences in duties, movements, and locations of crewmen. Doses to blood-forming organs were approximately 40 percent lower than the values measured at the body surface. In comparison with the doses actually received, the maximum operational dose (MOD) limit for each of the Apollo missions was set at 400 rads (X-ray equivalent) to skin and 50 rads to the blood-forming organs.

Radiation doses measured during Apollo were significantly lower than the yearly average of 5 rem[*] set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for workers who use radioactive materials in factories and institutions across the United States. Thus, radiation was not an operational problem during the Apollo Program. Doses received by the crewmen of Apollo missions 7 through 17 were small because no major solar-particle events occurred during those missions. One small event was detected by a radiation sensor outside the Apollo 12 spacecraft, but no increase in radiation dose to the crewmen inside the spacecraft was detected.

One particular effect possibly related to cosmic rays was the light-flash phenomenon reported on the Apollo 11 and subsequent missions. Although it is well known that ionizing radiations can produce visual phosphenes (subjective sensations best described as flashes of light) of the types reported, a definite correlation was not established between cosmic rays and the observation of flashes during the Apollo Program. The light flashes were described as starlike flashes or streaks of light that apparently occur within the eye. The flashes were observed only when the spacecraft cabin was dark or when blindfolds were provided and the crewmen were concentrating on detection of the flashes.

There is a possibility that visual flashes might indicate the occurrence of damage to the brain or eye; however, no damage has been observed among crewmen who experienced the light-flash phenomenon. During the Apollo 16 and 17 missions, a device known as the Apollo Light Flash Moving Emulsion Detector (ALFMED) was employed for the purpose of establishing if the flashes were indeed being caused by heavy cosmic rays. Further information regarding the light-flash phenomenon is contained in Section IV, Chapter 2 of this book.

Although Apollo missions did not undergo any major space radiation contingency, procedures for handling radiation problems were ready. The development of spacecraft dosimetry systems, the use of a space radiation surveillance network, and the availability of individuals with a thorough knowledge of space radiation assured that any contingency would be recognized immediately and would be coped with in a manner most expedient for both crewmember safety and mission objectives. The possible deterrent to manned space flight by large radiation doses was successfully avoided in the Apollo missions. More significantly, Apollo astronaut doses were negligible in terms of any medical or biological effects that could have impaired the function of man in the space environment.

The two key problems affecting safe operations with manmade radiation were resolved by design modifications. Leakage of radioactive materials from radioluminescent switch tips was eliminated by a change in encapsulating material. The problem of extensive emission of soft X-ray radiation from radioluminescent panels was resolved by applying a layer of plastic to the panels.

__________

[*]Roentgen Equivalent, Man refers to the absorbed dose of any ionizing radiation which produces the same biological effects in man as those resulting from the absorption of 1 roentgen of X-rays.


Summary and Conclusions

Radiation was not an operational problem during the Apollo Program. Doses received by the crewmen of Apollo missions 7 through 17 were small because no major solar-particle events occurred during those missions. One small event was detected by a radiation sensor outside the Apollo 12 spacecraft, but no increase in radiation dose to the crewmen inside the spacecraft was detected. Solar-particle releases are random events, and it is possible that flares, with the accompanying energetic nuclear particles, might hinder future flights beyond the magnetosphere of the Earth.

Radiation protection for the Apollo Program was focused on both the peculiarities of the natural space radiation environment and the increased prevalence of manmade radiation sources on the ground and onboard the spacecraft. Radiation-exposure risks to crewmen were assessed and balanced against mission gain to determine mission constraints. Operational radiation evaluation required specially designed radiation-detection systems onboard the spacecraft in addition to the use of satellite data, solar observatory support, and other liaison. Control and management of radioactive sources and radiation-generating equipment was important in minimizing radiation exposure of ground-support personnel, researchers, and the Apollo flight and backup crewmen.



References
Anon.: Occupational Safety and Health Standards. Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, part 1910, May 1971.
Anon.: Standards for Protection Against Radiation. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, part 20, rev. July 15, 1971.
Kastner, Jacob; Oltman, B.G.; Feige, Yehuda; and Gold, Raymond: Neutron Exposure to Lunar Astronauts. Health Phys., vol. 17, no. 5, Nov. 1969, pp. 732-733.

 
Top
1 replies since 25/3/2008, 22:52   4091 views
  Share